Erratum to: ``Indirect reciprocity in three types of social dilemmas

DOI10.1016/J.JTBI.2014.08.001zbMATH Open1334.91004OpenAlexW2039209165MaRDI QIDQ485686FDOQ485686

Authors Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Hisashi Ohtsuki

Publication date 13 January 2015

Published in Journal of Theoretical Biology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.08.001

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

2-person games (91A05) Evolutionary games (91A22) Social and behavioral sciences: general topics (91C99)

Recommendations

• Indirect reciprocity in three types of social dilemmas
• Erratum to: ``How should we define goodness? -- reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity
• Strength of the social dilemma in a public goods experiment: An exploration of the error hypothesis
• Erratum: On strategy-proof social choice correspondences
• Corrigendum to ``Indirect reciprocity with trinary reputations
• Payoff non-linearity sways the effect of mistakes on the evolution of reciprocity
• Two wrongs don't make a right: the initial viability of different assessment rules in the evolution of indirect reciprocity
• The good, the bad and the discriminator -- errors in direct and indirect reciprocity
• Indirect reciprocity among imperfect individuals

Cited in

(2)

• The good, the bad and the discriminator -- errors in direct and indirect reciprocity
• Corrigendum to ``Indirect reciprocity with trinary reputations

This page was built for publication: Erratum to: ``Indirect reciprocity in three types of social dilemmas

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q485686)