Indirect reciprocity in three types of social dilemmas
DOI10.1016/J.JTBI.2014.03.035zbMATH Open1325.91009OpenAlexW2027219890WikidataQ47890486 ScholiaQ47890486MaRDI QIDQ890679FDOQ890679
Authors: Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Hisashi Ohtsuki
Publication date: 11 November 2015
Published in: Journal of Theoretical Biology (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://ir.soken.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=5410&item_no=1&attribute_id=22&file_no=1
Recommendations
- The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity
- Two wrongs don't make a right: the initial viability of different assessment rules in the evolution of indirect reciprocity
- The conflict of social norms may cause the collapse of cooperation: indirect reciprocity with opposing attitudes towards in-group favoritism
- The competition of assessment rules for indirect reciprocity
- How the indirect reciprocity with co-evolving norm and strategy for \(2\times 2\) prisoner's dilemma game works for emerging cooperation
2-person games (91A05) Evolutionary games (91A22) Social and behavioral sciences: general topics (91C99)
Cites Work
- The calculus of selfishness.
- Indirect reciprocity and strategic reputation building in an experimental helping game
- The competition of assessment rules for indirect reciprocity
- A tale of two defectors: the importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity
- Indirect reciprocity among imperfect individuals
- How should we define goodness? -- reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity
- The logic of reprobation: assessment and action rules for indirect reciprocation
- The good, the bad and the discriminator -- errors in direct and indirect reciprocity
- The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity
- The importance of subjectivity in perceptual errors on the emergence of indirect reciprocity
- Global analyses of evolutionary dynamics and exhaustive search for social norms that maintain cooperation by reputation
- Evolution of indirect reciprocity in groups of various sizes and comparison with direct reciprocity
- Learning dynamics in social dilemmas
- Social Norms and Community Enforcement
- Learning to cooperate via indirect reciprocity
- The evolution of norms
- Ingroup favoritism and intergroup cooperation under indirect reciprocity based on group reputation
- Indirect reciprocity with trinary reputations
- Evolutionary stability of first-order-information indirect reciprocity in sizable groups
- Effect of assessment error and private information on stern-judging in indirect reciprocity
- Two wrongs don't make a right: the initial viability of different assessment rules in the evolution of indirect reciprocity
Cited In (9)
- How the indirect reciprocity with co-evolving norm and strategy for \(2\times 2\) prisoner's dilemma game works for emerging cooperation
- Reactive strategies in indirect reciprocity
- The competition of assessment rules for indirect reciprocity
- Erratum to: ``Indirect reciprocity in three types of social dilemmas
- The good, the bad and the discriminator -- errors in direct and indirect reciprocity
- The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity
- Linkage based on the \textit{kandori} norm successfully sustains cooperation in social dilemmas
- The conflict of social norms may cause the collapse of cooperation: indirect reciprocity with opposing attitudes towards in-group favoritism
- A solution for private assessment in indirect reciprocity using solitary observation
This page was built for publication: Indirect reciprocity in three types of social dilemmas
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q890679)