Why you should not use ‘Hybrid’, ‘Power‐Law’ or related exponential schemes for convective modelling—there are much better alternatives

DOI10.1002/FLD.1650200602zbMATH Open0848.76048OpenAlexW1989985650MaRDI QIDQ4860907FDOQ4860907

Authors: B. P. Leonard, J. E. Drummond 

Publication date: 29 January 1996

Published in: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1650200602

Recommendations

• Modified exponential schemes for convection-diffusion problems
• An evaluation of eight discretization schemes for two-dimensional convection-diffusion equations
• CONDIF: A modified central-difference scheme for convective flows
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4098963
• A low‐diffusive and oscillation‐free convection scheme

zbMATH Keywords

effective Reynolds numberthermally driven cavity flowseffective Péclet numberrecirculation cells

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Finite difference methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics (76M20) Diffusion and convection (76R99)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (24)

• Two- and three-dimensional nested simulation by using FEM and FVA to analyze flows in an estuary
• Simulations of sooting turbulent jet flames using a hybrid flamelet/stochastic Eulerian field method
• A group of CFL-dependent flux-limiters to control the numerical dissipation in multi-stage unsteady calculation
• Numerical investigation of bifurcation phenomena occurring in flows through planar sudden expansions
• A novel finite volume scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws
• Natural convection in a rectangular cavity heated from below and cooled from top as well as the sides
• Symmetry breaking of melt flow typically encountered in a Bridgman configuration heated from below
• An efficient physics-based preconditioner for the fully implicit solution of small-scale thermally driven atmospheric flows.
• Numerical solution of Navier-Stokes equations using multiquadric radial basis function networks.
• A review on TVD schemes and a refined flux-limiter for steady-state calculations
• Analysis of unsteady pipe flow using the modified finite element method
• Firespread through fuel beds: Modeling of wind-aided fires and induced hydrodynamics
• Fully implicit kinetic solution of collisional plasmas
• An improved convection scheme applied to recombining divertor plasma flows
• Simple and accurate scheme for nonlinear convection-diffusion equation
• Comparison of the simple-central differences and exponential schemes on the flow in curved square ducts
• Modified exponential schemes for convection-diffusion problems
• Similarities and differences of two exponential schemes for convection-diffusion problems: the FV-CF and ENATE schemes
• Adaptive multiresolution approach for two-dimensional PDEs.
• A three-dimensional numerical simulation of impinging jet arrays on a moving plate
• OVERLAPPING CONTROL VOLUME APPROACH FOR CONVECTION-DIFFUSION PROBLEMS
• Combining Galerkin matrix perturbation with Taylor weak statement algorithms
• Numerical simulation of a methane/air radiating turbulent diffusion flame
• Three‐dimensional simulation of natural convection in cavities with side opening

This page was built for publication: Why you should not use ‘Hybrid’, ‘Power‐Law’ or related exponential schemes for convective modelling—there are much better alternatives

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4860907)