Memory lower bounds for randomized collaborative search and implications for biology

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4909402

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-33651-5_5zbMATH Open1321.68415arXiv1205.4545OpenAlexW1844529830MaRDI QIDQ4909402FDOQ4909402


Authors: Ofer Feinerman, Amos Korman Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 13 March 2013

Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Initial knowledge regarding group size can be crucial for collective performance. We study this relation in the context of the {em Ants Nearby Treasure Search (ANTS)} problem cite{FKLS}, which models natural cooperative foraging behavior such as that performed by ants around their nest. In this problem, k (probabilistic) agents, initially placed at some central location, collectively search for a treasure on the two-dimensional grid. The treasure is placed at a target location by an adversary and the goal is to find it as fast as possible as a function of both k and D, where D is the (unknown) distance between the central location and the target. It is easy to see that T=Omega(D+D2/k) time units are necessary for finding the treasure. Recently, it has been established that O(T) time is sufficient if the agents know their total number k (or a constant approximation of it), and enough memory bits are available at their disposal cite{FKLS}. In this paper, we establish lower bounds on the agent memory size required for achieving certain running time performances. To the best our knowledge, these bounds are the first non-trivial lower bounds for the memory size of probabilistic searchers. For example, for every given positive constant epsilon, terminating the search by time O(log1epsilonkcdotT) requires agents to use Omega(loglogk) memory bits. Such distributed computing bounds may provide a novel, strong tool for the investigation of complex biological systems.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.4545




Recommendations




Cited In (16)





This page was built for publication: Memory lower bounds for randomized collaborative search and implications for biology

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4909402)