Noisy vs. merely equivocal logics

DOI10.1007/978-94-007-4438-7_5MaRDI QIDQ4912985zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Patrick Allo

Publication date 2 April 2013

Published in Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4438-7_5

zbMATH Keywords

ambiguous connectivesmeaning of logical connectivesnatural language connectivessubstructural pluralism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Substructural logics (including relevance, entailment, linear logic, Lambek calculus, BCK and BCI logics) (03B47) Logic of natural languages (03B65)

Recommendations

• On when a disjunction is informative. Ambiguous connectives and a realist commitment to pluralism
• From natural to formal language: a case for logical pluralism
• The logic of ambiguity: the propositional case
• Logical pluralism and logical form
• Logical consequence and the paradoxes

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3504935 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1749198 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1357431 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3451824 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1406807 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2196617 (Why is no real title available?)
• Classical and non-classical logics: essay on the foundations of logic
• Harmony and autonomy in classical logic
• Logic for Equivocators
• Logical pluralism
• Logical pluralism and semantic information
• Meaning approached via proofs
• Relevance: A fallacy?
• Relevant logic and the theory of information
• Vagueness, truth and logic

Cited in

(2)

• Noise-based logic: binary, multi-valued, or fuzzy, with optional superposition of logic states
• On when a disjunction is informative. Ambiguous connectives and a realist commitment to pluralism

This page was built for publication: Noisy vs. merely equivocal logics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4912985)