On when a disjunction is informative. Ambiguous connectives and a realist commitment to pluralism
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2908754
DOI10.1007/978-94-007-1923-1_1zbMATH Open1284.03021OpenAlexW1504122544MaRDI QIDQ2908754FDOQ2908754
Authors: Patrick Allo
Publication date: 29 August 2012
Published in: The Realism-Antirealism Debate in the Age of Alternative Logics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1923-1_1
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Substructural logics: a primer
- Quine and Slater on paraconsistency and deviance
- What might be the case after a change in view
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Epistemic Conditionals and Conditional Epistemics
- Logical pluralism
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Information Flow
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- First degree entailments and information
- Information and impossibilities
- Relevant logic and the theory of information
- Logical pluralism and semantic information
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Information flow and impossible situations
- Burgess on relevance: A fallacy indeed
- Reply to Burgess and to Read
- Relevance: A fallacy?
- The validity of disjunctive syllogism is not so easily proved
- Special issue: Impossible worlds
- Relevant logic, probabilistic information, and conditionals
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (4)
This page was built for publication: On when a disjunction is informative. Ambiguous connectives and a realist commitment to pluralism
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2908754)