On when a disjunction is informative. Ambiguous connectives and a realist commitment to pluralism
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2908754
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3504935 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 596497 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1357431 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1932196 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3443559 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2196617 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 972605 (Why is no real title available?)
- Burgess on relevance: A fallacy indeed
- Epistemic Conditionals and Conditional Epistemics
- First degree entailments and information
- Information Flow
- Information and impossibilities
- Information flow and impossible situations
- Logical pluralism
- Logical pluralism and semantic information
- Quine and Slater on paraconsistency and deviance
- Relevance: A fallacy?
- Relevant logic and the theory of information
- Relevant logic, probabilistic information, and conditionals
- Reply to Burgess and to Read
- Special issue: Impossible worlds
- Substructural logics: a primer
- The validity of disjunctive syllogism is not so easily proved
- What might be the case after a change in view
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: On when a disjunction is informative. Ambiguous connectives and a realist commitment to pluralism
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2908754)