Panel forum on multiple comparison procedures: A commentary from a complex trial design and analysis plan
DOI10.1002/BIMJ.201200047zbMATH Open1441.62524OpenAlexW1582360448WikidataQ43878310 ScholiaQ43878310MaRDI QIDQ4921947FDOQ4921947
Sue-Jane Wang, Mohammad Huque, Frank Bretz, Jason C. Hsu, Alex Dmitrienko, Gary G. Koch, H. M. James Hung
Publication date: 28 May 2013
Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201200047
Recommendations
- Multiple comparisons in complex clinical trial designs
- Industry, Government, and Academic Panel Discussion on Multiple Comparisons in a “Real” Phase Three Clinical Trial
- On the behavior of multiple comparison procedures in complex parametric designs
- Multiple analyses in clinical trials. Fundamentals for investigators
- Protocol Designed Subgroup Analyses in Multiarmed Clinical Trials: Multiplicity Aspects
- Multiple testing procedures for analyzing stratified comparative clinical trials using odds ratios
correlationalpha propagationdecision path partition testDose-endpoint pairFisher's protected least significance differencemultiplicity-at-combined-trial level (or programwise type I error)parallel gatekeepingsingle hierarchical chaintruncated and regular hommel-based gatekeeping
Cites Work
- Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics
- Testing for Efficacy in Primary and Secondary Endpoints by Partitioning Decision Paths
- Challenges to multiple testing in clinical trials
- Graphical approaches for multiple comparison procedures using weighted Bonferroni, Simes, or parametric tests
- Development of gatekeeping strategies in confirmatory clinical trials
- Permutation Multiple Tests of Binary Features Do Not Uniformly Control Error Rates
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: Panel forum on multiple comparison procedures: A commentary from a complex trial design and analysis plan
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4921947)