Absolute vs. relative Gromov-Witten invariants
From MaRDI portal
Publication:508093
Abstract: In light of recent attempts to extend the Cieliebak-Mohnke approach for constructing Gromov-Witten invariants to positive genera, we compare the absolute and relative Gromov-Witten invariants of compact symplectic manifolds when the symplectic hypersurface contains no relevant holomorphic curves. We show that these invariants are then the same, except in a narrow range of dimensions of the target and genera of the domains, and provide examples when they fail to be the same.
Recommendations
Cited in
(13)- GW invariants relative to normal crossing divisors
- BPS invariants of symplectic log Calabi-Yau fourfolds
- Lower bounds for enumerative counts of positive-genus real curves
- Absolute and relative Gromov-Witten invariants of very ample hypersurfaces
- A comparison theorem for Gromov-Witten invariants in the symplectic category
- Relative family Gromov-Witten invariants and symplectomorphisms
- Relative Gromov-Witten invariants of projective completions of vector bundles
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2070019 (Why is no real title available?)
- Elliptic GW invariants of blowups along curves and surfaces
- On the rim tori refinement of relative Gromov-Witten invariants
- The fundamental class of smooth Kuranishi atlases with trivial isotropy
- Editors' note on ``The symplectic sum formula for Gromov-Witten invariants
- Relative Gromov-Witten invariants
This page was built for publication: Absolute vs. relative Gromov-Witten invariants
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q508093)