Honest signaling in zero-sum games is hard, and lying is even harder
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5111408
Abstract: We prove that, assuming the exponential time hypothesis, finding an epsilon-approximately optimal symmetric signaling scheme in a two-player zero-sum game requires quasi-polynomial time. This is tight by [Cheng et al., FOCS'15] and resolves an open question of [Dughmi, FOCS'14]. We also prove that finding a multiplicative approximation is NP-hard. We also introduce a new model where a dishonest signaler may publicly commit to use one scheme, but post signals according to a different scheme. For this model, we prove that even finding a (1-2^{-n})-approximately optimal scheme is NP-hard.
Recommendations
Cited in
(7)- Delegated online search
- Regret minimization in online Bayesian persuasion: handling adversarial receiver's types under full and partial feedback models
- On the hardness of designing public signals
- Dishonest signalling in a variant of pygmalion game
- Public Bayesian persuasion: being almost optimal and almost persuasive
- Algorithms for persuasion with limited communication
- A note on hardness of computing recursive teaching dimension
This page was built for publication: Honest signaling in zero-sum games is hard, and lying is even harder
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5111408)