Stability, cohomology vanishing, and nonapproximable groups

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5222162

DOI10.1017/FMS.2020.5zbMATH Open1456.22002arXiv1711.10238OpenAlexW3014166688MaRDI QIDQ5222162FDOQ5222162

Andreas Thom, Alexander Lubotzky, Marcus de Chiffre, Lev Glebsky

Publication date: 1 April 2020

Published in: Forum of Mathematics, Sigma (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Several well-known open questions (such as: are all groups sofic/hyperlinear?) have a common form: can all groups be approximated by asymptotic homomorphisms into the symmetric groups mathrmSym(n) (in the sofic case) or the finite dimensional unitary groups mU(n) (in the hyperlinear case)? In the case of mU(n), the question can be asked with respect to different metrics and norms. This paper answers, for the first time, one of these versions, showing that there exist fintely presented groups which are not approximated by mU(n) with respect to the Frobenius norm |T|mFrob=sqrtsumi,j=1n|Tij|2,T=[Tij]i,j=1ninmathrmMn(mathbbC). Our strategy is to show that some higher dimensional cohomology vanishing phenomena implies stability, that is, every Frobenius-approximate homomorphism into finite-dimensional unitary groups is close to an actual homomorphism. This is combined with existence results of certain non-residually finite central extensions of lattices in some simple p-adic Lie groups. These groups act on high rank Bruhat-Tits buildings and satisfy the needed vanishing cohomology phenomenon and are thus stable and not Frobenius-approximated.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10238




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (30)





This page was built for publication: Stability, cohomology vanishing, and nonapproximable groups

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5222162)