New prospects in social choice theory: median and average as tools for measuring, electing and ranking

MaRDI QIDQ5258136zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Ruffin-Benoît M. Ngoie, Zoïnabo Savadogo, Berthold Ulungu Ekunda Lukata

Publication date 25 June 2015

zbMATH Keywords

Borda majority countmajority judgmentmean-median compromise method

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14) Voting theory (91B12)

Recommendations

• A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking
• Tie-breaking the highest median: alternatives to the majority judgment
• Voting method based on an average gap assessment
• Mathematics to the rescue of democracy. What does voting mean and how can it be improved?
• Majority judgment. Measuring, ranking, and electing.

Cited in

(8)

• A metric procedure for cardinal preferences
• Voting method based on an average gap assessment
• Deepest voting: a new way of electing
• A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking
• Tie-breaking the highest median: alternatives to the majority judgment
• Voting with rubber bands, weights, and strings
• VMAVA+: (VOTING METHOD BASED ON APPROVAL VOTING AND ARITHMETIC MEAN)+
• A correspondence between voting procedures and stochastic orderings

This page was built for publication: New prospects in social choice theory: median and average as tools for measuring, electing and ranking

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5258136)