Strong failures of higher analogs of Hindman's theorem
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5367106
DOI10.1090/TRAN/7131zbMATH Open1423.03161arXiv1608.01512OpenAlexW3106404031MaRDI QIDQ5367106FDOQ5367106
Authors: David J. Fernández-Bretón, Assaf Rinot
Publication date: 12 October 2017
Published in: Transactions of the American Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: We show that various analogs of Hindman's Theorem fail in a strong sense when one attempts to obtain uncountable monochromatic sets: Theorem 1: There exists a colouring , such that for every with , and every colour , there are two distinct elements of for which . This forms a simultaneous generalization of a theorem of Hindman, Leader and Strauss and a theorem of Galvin and Shelah. Theorem 2: For every Abelian group , there exists a colouring such that for every uncountable , and every colour , for some large enough integer , there are pairwise distinct elements of such that . In addition, it is consistent that the preceding statement remains valid even after enlarging the set of colours from to . Theorem 3: Let assert that for every Abelian group of cardinality , there exists a colouring such that for every positive integer , every , and every , there are such that . Then holds for unboundedly many uncountable cardinals , and it is consistent that holds for all regular uncountable cardinals .
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.01512
Recommendations
Partition relations (03E02) Consistency and independence results (03E35) Commutative semigroups (20M14) Applications of set theory (03E75)
Cites Work
- Finite sums from sequences within cells of a partition of N
- Set Theory
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy
- Chain conditions of products, and weakly compact cardinals
- On Strongly Summable Ultrafilters and Union Ultrafilters
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Consistency of the Continuum Hypothesis. (AM-3)
- Algebra in the Stone-Čech compactification. Theory and applications
- Partitioning pairs of countable ordinals
- Partition Problems in Topology
- The higher infinite. Large cardinals in set theory from their beginnings.
- A topological reflection principle equivalent to Shelah’s strong hypothesis
- Combinatorial set theory: Partition relations for cardinals
- Was Sierpinski right? I
- A solution to the L space problem
- Some counterexamples in the partition calculus
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Chain conditions and products
- Transforming rectangles into squares, with applications to strong colorings
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Getting more colors. II
- Complicated colorings
- The generalized continuum hypothesis can fail everywhere
- Some strong axioms of infinity incompatible with the axiom of constructibility
- A certain 2-coloring of the reals
- Narrow Boolean algebras
- Square bracket partition relations in L
- Weak Partition Relations
- Pairwise sums in colourings of the reals
Cited In (17)
- Monochromatic sumset without large cardinals
- Algebra, selections, and additive Ramsey theory
- Hindman's theorem is only a countable phenomenon
- Is there a symmetric version of Hindman's theorem?
- A weak variant of Hindman's theorem stronger than Hilbert's theorem
- Knaster and friends. I: Closed colorings and precalibers
- A Ramsey statement for infinite groups
- Infinite monochromatic sumsets for colourings of the reals
- Hindman's theorem and choice
- Hindman's coloring theorem in arbitrary semigroups
- Transformations of the transfinite plane
- Sums of triples in Abelian groups
- The Adjacent Hindman’s Theorem for uncountable groups
- Borel combinatorics fail in HYP
- A note on Hindman-type theorems for uncountable cardinals
- Pairwise sums in colourings of the reals
- Hindman-like theorems with uncountably many colours and finite monochromatic sets
This page was built for publication: Strong failures of higher analogs of Hindman's theorem
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5367106)