Should Silence be Heard? Fair Rational Secret Sharing with Silent and Non-silent Players
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5498732
Recommendations
- Utility Dependence in Correct and Fair Rational Secret Sharing
- Utility dependence in correct and fair rational secret sharing
- Proactive Secret Sharing with a Dishonest Majority
- Rational Secret Sharing, Revisited
- How to Share Secrets: The Idea of Geometric Threshold Games
- Private communication in competing mechanism games
- Brief announcement: Proactive secret sharing with a dishonest majority
- Realistic versus rational secret sharing
- Using or hiding private information? An experimental study of zero-sum repeated games with incomplete information
Cited in
(5)- Utility dependence in correct and fair rational secret sharing
- Fairness with an Honest Minority and a Rational Majority
- Utility Dependence in Correct and Fair Rational Secret Sharing
- Impact of keeping silence on spatial reciprocity in spatial games
- Fair and sound secret sharing from homomorphic time-lock puzzles
This page was built for publication: Should Silence be Heard? Fair Rational Secret Sharing with Silent and Non-silent Players
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5498732)