Should Silence be Heard? Fair Rational Secret Sharing with Silent and Non-silent Players

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-12280-9_16MaRDI QIDQ5498732zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Sourya Joyee de, Sushmita Ruj, A. K. Pal

Publication date 10 February 2015

Published in Cryptology and Network Security (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12280-9_16

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Cryptography (94A60)

Recommendations

• Utility Dependence in Correct and Fair Rational Secret Sharing
• Utility dependence in correct and fair rational secret sharing
• Proactive Secret Sharing with a Dishonest Majority
• Rational Secret Sharing, Revisited
• How to Share Secrets: The Idea of Geometric Threshold Games
• Private communication in competing mechanism games
• Brief announcement: Proactive secret sharing with a dishonest majority
• Realistic versus rational secret sharing
• Using or hiding private information? An experimental study of zero-sum repeated games with incomplete information

Cited in

(5)

• Utility dependence in correct and fair rational secret sharing
• Fairness with an Honest Minority and a Rational Majority
• Utility Dependence in Correct and Fair Rational Secret Sharing
• Impact of keeping silence on spatial reciprocity in spatial games
• Fair and sound secret sharing from homomorphic time-lock puzzles

This page was built for publication: Should Silence be Heard? Fair Rational Secret Sharing with Silent and Non-silent Players

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5498732)