Clustered Encouragement Designs with Individual Noncompliance: Bayesian Inference with Randomization, and Application to Advance Directive Forms

DOI10.1093/BIOSTATISTICS/3.2.147zbMATHOpenAlexWikidataMaRDI QIDQ5701136FDO

Authors Constantine E. Frangakis, Donald B. Rubin, Xiao-Hua Zhou

Publication date 2 November 2005

Published in Biostatistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/3.2.147

zbMATH Keywords

ClusteringRubin causal modelCausal inferenceNoncomplianceAdvance directivePhenomenological Bayesian model

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Bayesian inference (62F15) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Recommendations

• Methods for clustered encouragement design studies with noncompliance and missing data
• Bayesian inference for causal effects in randomized experiments with noncompliance
• Estimation and Inference for the Causal Effect of Receiving Treatment on a Multinomial Outcome
• Assessing the effect of an influenza vaccine in an encouragement design
• Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models

Cited in

(18)

• The essential role of pair matching in cluster-randomized experiments, with application to the Mexican Universal Health Insurance evaluation
• Estimating causal effects of treatment in RCTs with provider and subject noncompliance
• What are the statistical implications of treatment non-compliance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study
• A powerful and robust test statistic for randomization inference in group-randomized trials with matched pairs of groups
• An Extended General Location Model for Causal Inferences from Data Subject to Noncompliance and Missing Values
• Methods for clustered encouragement design studies with noncompliance and missing data
• Designs in partially controlled studies: messages from a review
• Simple maximum likelihood estimates of efficacy in randomized trials and before-and-after studies, with implications for meta-analysis
• Principal stratification in causal inference
• Bridging preference‐based instrumental variable studies and cluster‐randomized encouragement experiments: Study design, noncompliance, and average cluster effect ratio
• Exploring Encouragement, Treatment, and Spillover Effects Using Principal Stratification, With Application to a Field Experiment on Teens’ Museum Attendance
• Bounding the local average treatment effect in an instrumental variable analysis of engagement with a mobile intervention
• A Potential Outcomes Approach to Developmental Toxicity Analyses
• Multiple Imputation Methods for Treatment Noncompliance and Nonresponse in Randomized Clinical Trials
• Simple maximum likelihood estimates of efficacy in randomized trials and before-and-after studies, with implications for meta-analysis
• Designs in partially controlled studies: messages from a review
• The potential for bias in principal causal effect estimation when treatment received depends on a key covariate
• A mixed model approach to estimate the survivor average causal effect in cluster-randomized trials

This page was built for publication: Clustered Encouragement Designs with Individual Noncompliance: Bayesian Inference with Randomization, and Application to Advance Directive Forms

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5701136)