Comment: Bayesian Ideas Reemerged in the 1950s

DOI10.1080/00031305.2012.751881MaRDI QIDQ5877096zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Stephen E. Fienberg

Publication date 3 February 2023

Published in The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2012.751881

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites work

• Bayesian models and methods in public policy and government settings
• Does it make sense to be an ``objective Bayesian? (Comment on articles by Berger and by Goldstein)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4097331 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6406492 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3288321 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3197577 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3059214 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3087284 (Why is no real title available?)
• When did Bayesian inference become ``Bayesian?
• “Not Only Defended But Also Applied”: The Perceived Absurdity of Bayesian Inference

This page was built for publication: Comment: Bayesian Ideas Reemerged in the 1950s

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5877096)