Dissonant Conclusions When Testing the Validity of an Instrumental Variable

DOI10.1080/00031305.2014.962764OpenAlexW2044833268WikidataQ58145787 ScholiaQ58145787MaRDI QIDQ5877678FDOQ5877678

Scott A. Lorch, Dylan S. Small, José R. Zubizarreta, Fan Yang, Paul R. Rosenbaum

Publication date: 15 February 2023

Published in: The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2014.962764

zbMATH Keywords

causal inferenceinstrumental variableobservational studyaporiahealth outcomes research

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites Work

• Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables
• Building a Stronger Instrument in an Observational Study of Perinatal Care for Premature Infants
• Two further applications of a model for binary regression
• Robust, Accurate Confidence Intervals with a Weak Instrument: Quarter of Birth and Education
• Regression and weighting methods for causal inference using instrumental variables
• Stronger instruments via integer programming in an observational study of late preterm birth outcomes
• Semiparametric estimation and inference for distributional and general treatment effects
• Amplification of Sensitivity Analysis in Matched Observational Studies
• Attributing Effects to Treatment in Matched Observational Studies

Cited In (3)

• Valid instrumental variable selection method using negative control outcomes and constructing efficient estimator
• The risk of maternal complications after Cesarean delivery: near-far matching for instrumental variables study designs with large observational datasets
• Optimal Tradeoffs in Matched Designs Comparing US-Trained and Internationally Trained Surgeons

This page was built for publication: Dissonant Conclusions When Testing the Validity of an Instrumental Variable

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5877678)