Dissonant Conclusions When Testing the Validity of an Instrumental Variable
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5877678
Recommendations
- Building a stronger instrument in an observational study of perinatal care for premature infants
- A test for instrument validity
- Generalized instrumental inequalities: testing the instrumental variable independence assumption
- Instrumental variable estimators for binary outcomes
- On falsification of the binary instrumental variable model
Cites work
- Amplification of sensitivity analysis in matched observational studies
- Attributing Effects to Treatment in Matched Observational Studies
- Building a stronger instrument in an observational study of perinatal care for premature infants
- Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables
- Regression and weighting methods for causal inference using instrumental variables
- Robust, Accurate Confidence Intervals with a Weak Instrument: Quarter of Birth and Education
- Semiparametric estimation and inference for distributional and general treatment effects
- Stronger instruments via integer programming in an observational study of late preterm birth outcomes
- Two further applications of a model for binary regression
Cited in
(3)- Optimal tradeoffs in matched designs comparing US-trained and internationally trained surgeons
- Valid instrumental variable selection method using negative control outcomes and constructing efficient estimator
- The risk of maternal complications after Cesarean delivery: near-far matching for instrumental variables study designs with large observational datasets
This page was built for publication: Dissonant Conclusions When Testing the Validity of an Instrumental Variable
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5877678)
