NONCLASSICAL TRUTH WITH CLASSICAL STRENGTH. A PROOF-THEORETIC ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITIONAL TRUTH OVER HYPE

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6041345

DOI10.1017/S1755020321000137arXiv2007.07188OpenAlexW3151780069MaRDI QIDQ6041345FDOQ6041345


Authors: Carlo Nicolai Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 26 May 2023

Published in: The Review of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Questions concerning the proof-theoretic strength of classical versus non-classical theories of truth have received some attention recently. A particularly convenient case study concerns classical and nonclassical axiomatizations of fixed-point semantics. It is known that nonclassical axiomatizations in four- or three-valued logics are substantially weaker than their classical counterparts. In this paper we consider the addition of a suitable conditional to First-Degree Entailment -- a logic recently studied by Hannes Leitgeb under the label `HYPE'. We show in particular that, by formulating the theory PKF over HYPE one obtains a theory that is sound with respect to fixed-point models, while being proof-theoretically on a par with its classical counterpart KF. Moreover, we establish that also its schematic extension -- in the sense of Feferman -- is as strong as the schematic extension of KF, thus matching the strength of predicative analysis.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07188




Recommendations




Cites Work






This page was built for publication: NONCLASSICAL TRUTH WITH CLASSICAL STRENGTH. A PROOF-THEORETIC ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITIONAL TRUTH OVER HYPE

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6041345)