Identifying logical evidence

DOI10.1007/s11229-020-02618-yzbMath1525.03029OpenAlexW3010844921MaRDI QIDQ6067304

No author found.

Publication date: 14 December 2023

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02618-y

zbMATH Keywords

dialetheismlogical abductivismlogical epistemologyself-referential paradoxeslogical evidencepractice-based approach

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cites Work

• The justification of the basic laws of logic
• Pi on earth, or mathematics in the real world
• The logic of paradox
• Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and `coupled trees'
• Yes, Virginia, there really are paraconsistent logics
• Paraconsistent logics?
• On the theory of inconsistent formal systems
• Propositional calculus for contradictory deductive systems
• The Case of Dialetheism
• Category Theory and the Foundations of Mathematics
• Outline of a Theory of Truth
• In Defence of Dialetheism: A Reply to Beziau and Tkaczyk
• New Foundations for Mathematical Logic
• The inconsistency of certain formal logics
• General Theory of Natural Equivalences
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item