Abstract: We show that Worm domains are not Gromov hyperbolic with respect to the Kobayashi distance.
This is a very well-written, neat paper. The authors show that worm domains are not Gromov hyperbolic with respect to the Kobayashi distance.
Cites work
- A construction of peak functions on weakly pseudoconvex domains
- Analysis and geometry on worm domains
- Behavior of the Bergman projection on the Diederich-Fornæss worm
- Diederich-Fornæss and Steinness indices for abstract CR manifolds
- Gromov hyperbolicity and the Kobayashi metric on convex domains of finite type
- Gromov hyperbolicity and the Kobayashi metric on strictly pseudoconvex domains
- Gromov hyperbolicity of pseudoconvex finite type domains in \(\mathbb{C}^2\)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1249530 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1124135 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1161515 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1385418 (Why is no real title available?)
- Levisches Problem und Rungescher Satz für Teilgebiete Steinscher Mannigfaltigkeiten
- On the Gromov hyperbolicity of convex domains in \(\mathbb{C}^n\)
- Peak points for pseudoconvex domains: A survey
- Pseudoconvex domains: An example with nontrivial nebenhuelle
- Tautness and complete hyperbolicity of domains in $\mathbb {C}^n$
- The core of the Levi distribution
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Worm domains are not Gromov hyperbolic
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6113282)
