Variable selection for categorical response: a comparative study
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6177005
DOI10.1007/s00180-022-01260-1OpenAlexW4285493404MaRDI QIDQ6177005
Damitri Kundu, Kiranmoy Das, Sweata Sen
Publication date: 29 August 2023
Published in: Computational Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-022-01260-1
Gibbs samplerMCMCKolmogorov-Smirnov testBayesian Lassocategorical responsedata-augmentationlogistic Lasso
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Marginal empirical likelihood and sure independence feature screening
- Nonparametric regression using Bayesian variable selection
- Least angle regression. (With discussion)
- Model-free conditional screening via conditional distance correlation
- The Bayesian elastic net
- On the robustness of the adaptive lasso to model misspecification
- Forward Regression for Ultra-High Dimensional Variable Screening
- Bayesian Estimation and Comparison of Moment Condition Models
- Marginal Likelihood from the Gibbs Output
- The Bayesian Lasso
- Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties
- Sure Independence Screening for Ultrahigh Dimensional Feature Space
- Dirichlet Lasso: A Bayesian approach to variable selection
- Feature Selection for Varying Coefficient Models With Ultrahigh-Dimensional Covariates
- Nonparametric Independence Screening in Sparse Ultra-High-Dimensional Varying Coefficient Models
- Modeling Multiple Time-Varying Related Groups: A Dynamic Hierarchical Bayesian Approach With an Application to the Health and Retirement Study
- Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data
- Regularization and Variable Selection Via the Elastic Net
- High Dimensional Ordinary Least Squares Projection for Screening Variables
- The Kolmogorov filter for variable screening in high-dimensional binary classification
- Empirical Bayes Gibbs sampling
- Benchmark priors for Bayesian model averaging.
This page was built for publication: Variable selection for categorical response: a comparative study