Ambiguity aversion and the propensities for self-insurance and self-protection
From MaRDI portal
Publication:625694
DOI10.1007/s11166-010-9112-yzbMath1206.91026MaRDI QIDQ625694
Publication date: 25 February 2011
Published in: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-010-9112-y
Related Items
AN ECONOMIC PREMIUM PRINCIPLE UNDER THE DUAL THEORY OF THE SMOOTH AMBIGUITY MODEL, When Risk Perception Gets in the Way: Probability Weighting and Underprevention, DISTORTION RISK MEASURES, AMBIGUITY AVERSION AND OPTIMAL EFFORT, The impact of ambiguity and prudence on prevention decisions, Ambiguity aversion, higher-order risk attitude and optimal effort, Who should exert more effort? Risk aversion, downside risk aversion and optimal prevention, On ambiguity apportionment, Insurance bargaining under ambiguity, Revisiting precautionary saving under ambiguity, Comparative ambiguity aversion and downside ambiguity aversion
Cites Work
- Self-insurance, self-protection and increased risk aversion
- A simplified axiomatic approach to ambiguity aversion
- Conditional payments and self-protection
- Ambiguity and the value of information
- A theory of subjective compound lotteries
- Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
- Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
- Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity
- Commonalities in time and ambiguity aversion for long-term risks
- Hopes and fears: The conflicting effects of risk ambiguity
- Small worlds: Modeling attitudes toward sources of uncertainty
- The impact of prudence on optimal prevention
- Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
- Uncertainty Aversion with Second-Order Utilities and Probabilities
- Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
- Insurance and Individual Incentives in Adaptive Contexts
- The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk
- A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity
- Comparative ignorance and the Ellsberg paradox