Bohmian trajectories and the ether: where does the analogy fail?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:643044

DOI10.1016/J.SHPSB.2005.09.005zbMATH Open1223.81036arXivquant-ph/0502049OpenAlexW2050026222MaRDI QIDQ643044FDOQ643044


Authors: Louis Marchildon Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 27 October 2011

Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Once considered essential to the explanation of electromagnetic phenomena, the ether was eventually discarded after the advent of special relativity. The lack of empirical signature of realist interpretative schemes of quantum mechanics, like Bohmian trajectories, has led some to conclude that, just like the ether, they can be dispensed with, replaced by the corresponding emergence of the concept of information. Although devices like Bohmian trajectories and the ether do present important analogies, I argue that there is also a crucial difference, related to distinct explanatory functions of quantum mechanics.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0502049




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (1)





This page was built for publication: Bohmian trajectories and the ether: where does the analogy fail?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q643044)