Bohmian trajectories and the ether: where does the analogy fail?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:643044
DOI10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.09.005zbMath1223.81036arXivquant-ph/0502049OpenAlexW2050026222MaRDI QIDQ643044
Publication date: 27 October 2011
Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0502049
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing
- Characterizing quantum theory in terms of information-theoretic constraints
- Everett and structure
- Why the quantum?
- Solving the measurement problem: de Broglie-Bohm loses out to Everett
- Quantum mechanics is about quantum information
- The principle underlying quantum mechanics
- Why should we interpret quantum mechanics?
- Relational quantum mechanics
- Remote preparation of arbitrary ensembles and quantum bit commitment
- The origins of length contraction: I. The FitzGerald–Lorentz deformation hypothesis
- Philosophical Concepts in Physics
- Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
- Quantum gravity as a dissipative deterministic system
- A Philosopher's Understanding of Quantum Mechanics
- A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
This page was built for publication: Bohmian trajectories and the ether: where does the analogy fail?
