From polynomial IOP and commitments to non-malleable zkSNARKs
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6582227
DOI10.1007/978-3-031-48621-0_16zbMATH Open1544.94239MaRDI QIDQ6582227FDOQ6582227
Authors: Antonio Faonio, Dario Fiore, Markulf Kohlweiss, Luigi Russo, Michal Zajac
Publication date: 2 August 2024
Recommendations
blockchain scalabilityknowledge-soundnessnon-interactive succinct zero-knowledge arguments of knowledge
Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.) (68T20) Data encryption (aspects in computer science) (68P25) Cryptography (94A60)
Cites Work
- Snarks for C: verifying program executions succinctly and in zero knowledge
- Efficient public-key cryptography in the presence of key leakage
- The knowledge complexity of interactive proof-systems
- Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT 2004
- On the Non-malleability of the Fiat-Shamir Transform
- On Signatures of Knowledge
- Leakage-resilient zero knowledge
- Short pairing-based non-interactive zero-knowledge arguments
- Progression-free sets and sublinear pairing-based non-interactive zero-knowledge arguments
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Quadratic span programs and succinct NIZKs without PCPs
- Communication-Efficient Non-interactive Proofs of Knowledge with Online Extractors
- Updatable and universal common reference strings with applications to zk-SNARKs
- The algebraic group model and its applications
- Aurora: transparent succinct arguments for R1CS
- Scalable zero knowledge with no trusted setup
- Shorter quasi-adaptive NIZK proofs for linear subspaces
- Marlin: preprocessing zkSNARKs with universal and updatable SRS
- On the size of pairing-based non-interactive arguments
- Interactive oracle proofs
- Snarky signatures: minimal signatures of knowledge from simulation-extractable snarks
- Constant-Size Commitments to Polynomials and Their Applications
- Subtleties in the definition of IND-CCA: when and how should challenge decryption be disallowed?
- Transparent SNARKs from DARK compilers
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Aggregatable subvector commitments for stateless cryptocurrencies
- Recursive proof composition from accumulation schemes
- \textsf{Halo Infinite}: proof-carrying data from additive polynomial commitments
- An algebraic framework for universal and updatable SNARKs
- Another look at extraction and randomization of Groth's zk-SNARK
- Fiat-Shamir bulletproofs are non-malleable (in the algebraic group model)
- Dory: efficient, transparent arguments for generalised inner products and polynomial commitments
- Polynomial IOPs for linear algebra relations
- Witness-succinct universally-composable SNARKs
- Spartan and bulletproofs are simulation-extractable (for free!)
- What makes Fiat-Shamir zkSNARKs (updatable SRS) simulation extractable?
- \(\mathcal{Lunar}\): a toolbox for more efficient universal and updatable zkSNARKs and commit-and-prove extensions
- Algebraic adversaries in the universal composability framework
Cited In (1)
This page was built for publication: From polynomial IOP and commitments to non-malleable zkSNARKs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6582227)