Which `intensional paradoxes' are paradoxes?

DOI10.1007/S10992-024-09761-8MaRDI QIDQ6606835zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Neil Tennant

Publication date 17 September 2024

Published in Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

zbMATH Keywords

normal formsquantified propositional logicRussell's paradox of propositionsconstructive \textit{reductio}prior's intensional paradoxesproof-theoretic criterion of paradoxicality

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Mathematical logic and foundations (03-XX)

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3829861 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1281125 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1406467 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3275554 (Why is no real title available?)
• A new unified account of truth and paradox
• Core Logic
• Cut for classical core logic
• Cut for core logic
• Ekman's paradox
• Frege's class theory and the logic of sets
• Harmony and paradox. Intensional aspects of proof-theoretic semantics
• Natural deduction with general elimination rules
• On Paradox without Self-Reference
• On paradoxes in normal form
• Open Problems in Proof-Theoretic Semantics
• Outline of a Theory of Truth
• Paradox without Self-Reference
• Paradoxes of intensionality
• Proof and Paradox
• Proof-theoretic semantics, paradoxes and the distinction between sense and denotation
• Proof-theoretic semantics, self-contradiction, and the format of deductive reasoning
• Propositions in Prepositional Logic Provable Only by Indirect Proofs
• Some results on the limits of thought
• The foundations of mathematics.
• The logic of number
• The principles of Mathematics. Vol I.
• The truth is never simple

This page was built for publication: Which `intensional paradoxes' are paradoxes?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6606835)