Symplectic period for a representation of GL_n (D)
The branching problem is one of the most important and fascinating problems in representation theory. The motivation for the paper under review is the symplectic period problem, that is, the classification of irreducible admissible representations of \(\mathrm{GL}_{2n}(F)\) which support a non-zero functional invariant under \(\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}(F)\). Here, \(F\) is a non-Archimedean local field of characteristic \(0\). This problem starts with \textit{A. A. Klyachko} [Math. USSR, Sb. 48, 365--379 (1984; Zbl 0543.20026)] in the finite field case. \textit{M. J. Heumos} and \textit{S. Rallis} [Pac. J. Math. 146, No. 2, 247--279 (1990; Zbl 0752.22012)] first considered the \(p\)-adic field case. One of their results shows that supercuspidal representations cannot have a symplectic period. This result can also be explained using the relative Langlands duality. In fact, as \(\mathrm{GL}_{2n}/\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}\) is a non-tempered spherical variety, it is expected that only residual representations show up in its spectrum.\N\NIn a series of papers, \textit{O. Offen} and \textit{E. Sayag} [Int. Math. Res. Not. 2008, Article ID rnm136, 25 p. (2008; Zbl 1158.22021); J. Number Theory 125, No. 2, 344--355 (2007; Zbl 1147.11028); J. Funct. Anal. 254, No. 11, 2846--2865 (2008; Zbl 1143.22013)] give a classification of unitary representations of \(\mathrm{GL}_{2n}(F)\) which have symplectic periods. Along the way, they also corrected several inaccuracies and close several gaps in previous papers. We refer the reader to [Offen and Sayag, Zbl 1143.22013] for some history of this problem.\N\NThe paper under review considers the inner form version of the symplectic period problem. Indeed, the authors consider irreducible admissible representations of \(\mathrm{GL}_{n}(D)\) where \(D\) is a quaternion algebra over \(F\). There are several new phenomena for this problem. For example, the parabolic induction of two representations without symplectic period can have a symplectic period. Another interesting fact is that when \(n\) is odd, there are supercuspidal representations that have symplectic periods. The main results of this paper give a classification of irreducible admissible representations with a symplectic period when \(n=3,4\). For the reason mentioned above, when \(n=3\), the authors only consider non-supercuspidal representations.
- Banal representations of \(\mathrm{GL}_m(D)\)
- EXT-ANALOGUES OF BRANCHING LAWS
- Global Mixed Periods and Local Klyachko Models for the General Linear Group
- Howe correspondences on a p-adic field
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3933362 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 48964 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3533491 (Why is no real title available?)
- Induced representations of GL (n, A) for p-adic division algebras A.
- Induced representations of reductive ${\germ p}$-adic groups. I
- Induced representations of reductive ${\germ p}$-adic groups. II. On irreducible representations of ${\rm GL}(n)$
- Klyachko models for ladder representations
- MODELS FOR THE COMPLEX REPRESENTATIONS OF THE GROUPS $ \mathrm{GL}(n,\,q)$
- On representations of \(\mathrm {GL}_{2n}(F)\) with a symplectic period
- On symplectic periods for inner forms of \(\mathrm{GL}_n\)
- On the Restriction to 𝒟* × 𝒟* of Representations of p-adic GL2(𝒟)
- On unitary representations of \(\mathrm{GL}_{2n}\) distinguished by the symplectic group
- Symplectic-Whittaker models for \(Gl_ n\)
- Uniqueness and disjointness of Klyachko models
- Zelevinsky involution and Moeglin-Waldspurger algorithm for \(GL_n(D)\)
This page was built for publication: Symplectic period for a representation of \(\mathrm{GL}_n (\mathrm{D})\)
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6982718)
