A comment on some recent results concerning the reverse order law for \ 1, 3, 4 \-inverses

From MaRDI portal
Publication:708139





A generalized inverse of an \(m \times n\) matrix \(A\) is an \(n \times m\) matrix \(X\) satisfying some of the following four Penrose equations: \[ (1)\quad AXA=A, \qquad (2)\quad XAX=X,\qquad (3)\quad (AX)^*=AX, \qquad (4)\quad (XA)^*=XA. \] Let \(\emptyset\neq \rho\subseteq \{1, 2, 3, 4\}\). Then \(A\rho\) denotes the set of all matrices \(X\) which satisfy (i) for all \(i \in \rho\). Motivated by a result of \textit{D. Liu} and \textit{H. Yang} [Appl. Math. Comput. 215, No.~12, 4293--4303 (2010; Zbl 1187.15005)], the authors prove that \((AB)\{1,3,4\} \subseteq B\{1,3,4\} \cdot A\{1,3,4\}\) is equivalent to \((AB)\{1,3,4\}= B\{1,3,4\} \cdot A\{1,3,4\}\). They show that \((AB)\{1,3,4\} \subseteq B\{1,3,4\} \cdot A\{1,3,4\}\) can only be possible if \(n \leq m\) and in this case, they present purely algebraic necessary and sufficient conditions for this inclusion to hold. In addition they give some characterizations of \(B\{1,3,4\} \cdot A\{1,3,4\}\subseteq (AB)\{1,3,4\}\).











This page was built for publication: A comment on some recent results concerning the reverse order law for \(\{ 1, 3, 4 \}\)-inverses

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q708139)