How we may have been misled into believing in the interpersonal comparability of utility
From MaRDI portal
Publication:792196
DOI10.1007/BF00125671zbMATH Open0536.90010MaRDI QIDQ792196FDOQ792196
Publication date: 1983
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Recommendations
- On interpersonal utility comparisons
- On intra- and interpersonal utility comparisons
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3961387
- Reconciling interpersonal comparability and the intensity of preference for the utility sum rule
- Interpersonal level comparability does not imply comparability of utility differences -- a comment on Ng
- Are interpersonal comparisons of utility indeterminate?
- Interpersonal level comparability implies comparability of utility differences
- Objective interpersonal comparisons of utility
- Interpersonal comparisons of utility and the policy paralysis problem
- Interpersonal comparisons of utility for 2 of 3 types of people
Cites Work
Cited In (6)
- Are interpersonal comparisons of utility indeterminate?
- The ostrogorski paradox and its relation to nontransitive choice
- Interpersonal comparisons of utility for 2 of 3 types of people
- Multimode utility theory
- Factual versus representational utilities and their interdimensional comparisons
- Interpersonal level comparability implies comparability of utility differences
This page was built for publication: How we may have been misled into believing in the interpersonal comparability of utility
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q792196)