Expected subjective utility: Is the Neumann-Morgenstern utility the same as the Neoclassical's?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:800205
Recommendations
- Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
- Subjective expected utility with nonincreasing risk aversion
- Subjective expected utility without preferences
- Expected qualitative utility maximization
- An extension of a theorem of von Neumann and Morgenstern with an application to social choice theory
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3735506 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3361657 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3048439 (Why is no real title available?)
- Bentham or Bergson? Finite Sensibility, Utility Functions and Social Welfare Functions
- Social choice and individual values
- Theory of games and economic behavior.
Cited in
(10)- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 679853 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 733410 (Why is no real title available?)
- Neurobiological measurements of cardinal utility: Hedonimeters or learning algorithms?
- An extension of a theorem of von Neumann and Morgenstern with an application to social choice theory
- A systemic critique of neoclassical utility theory
- Population dynamics and animal welfare: Issues raised by the culling of kangaroos in Puckapun\-yal
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4079113 (Why is no real title available?)
- A connection between von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility and symmetric potential games
- Nash was a first to axiomatize expected utility
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1552159 (Why is no real title available?)
This page was built for publication: Expected subjective utility: Is the Neumann-Morgenstern utility the same as the Neoclassical's?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q800205)
