Expected subjective utility: Is the Neumann-Morgenstern utility the same as the Neoclassical's?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:800205
DOI10.1007/BF00433515zbMATH Open0549.90011OpenAlexW2127918468MaRDI QIDQ800205FDOQ800205
Authors: Yew-Kwang Ng 
Publication date: 1984
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00433515
Recommendations
- Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
- Subjective expected utility with nonincreasing risk aversion
- Subjective expected utility without preferences
- Expected qualitative utility maximization
- An extension of a theorem of von Neumann and Morgenstern with an application to social choice theory
social choicefinite sensibilityindividual risk aversionNeumann-Morgenstern expected utilityutility measurability
Cites Work
Cited In (10)
- Neurobiological measurements of cardinal utility: Hedonimeters or learning algorithms?
- A systemic critique of neoclassical utility theory
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Population dynamics and animal welfare: Issues raised by the culling of kangaroos in Puckapun\-yal
- Nash was a first to axiomatize expected utility
- A connection between von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility and symmetric potential games
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- An extension of a theorem of von Neumann and Morgenstern with an application to social choice theory
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
This page was built for publication: Expected subjective utility: Is the Neumann-Morgenstern utility the same as the Neoclassical's?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q800205)
