On the minimal number of matrices which form a locally hypercyclic, non-hypercyclic tuple

From MaRDI portal
Publication:847770

DOI10.1016/J.JMAA.2009.10.020zbMATH Open1200.47014arXiv0904.3142OpenAlexW2082407767MaRDI QIDQ847770FDOQ847770


Authors: G. Costakis, Demetris Hadjiloucas, Antonios Manoussos Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 19 February 2010

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In this paper we extend the notion of a locally hypercyclic operator to that of a locally hypercyclic tuple of operators. We then show that the class of hypercyclic tuples of operators forms a proper subclass to that of locally hypercyclic tuples of operators. What is rather remarkable is that in every finite dimensional vector space over mathbbR or mathbbC, a pair of commuting matrices exists which forms a locally hypercyclic, non-hypercyclic tuple. This comes in direct contrast to the case of hypercyclic tuples where the minimal number of matrices required for hypercyclicity is related to the dimension of the vector space. In this direction we prove that the minimal number of diagonal matrices required to form a hypercyclic tuple on mathbbRn is n+1, thus complementing a recent result due to Feldman.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0904.3142




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (23)





This page was built for publication: On the minimal number of matrices which form a locally hypercyclic, non-hypercyclic tuple

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q847770)