Operator mixing in N=4 SYM: the Konishi anomaly revisited

From MaRDI portal
Publication:876145

DOI10.1016/J.NUCLPHYSB.2005.06.005zbMATH Open1128.81324arXivhep-th/0501077OpenAlexW2148338550MaRDI QIDQ876145FDOQ876145


Authors: C. Jarczak, Ya. S. Stanev, Burkhard Eden, Emery Sokatchev Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 16 April 2007

Published in: Nuclear Physics B (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In the context of the superconformal N=4 SYM theory the Konishi anomaly can be viewed as the descendant K10 of the Konishi multiplet in the 10 of SU(4), carrying the anomalous dimension of the multiplet. Another descendant O10 with the same quantum numbers, but this time without anomalous dimension, is obtained from the protected half-BPS operator O20 (the stress-tensor multiplet). Both K10 and O10 are renormalized mixtures of the same two bare operators, one trilinear (coming from the superpotential), the other bilinear (the so-called "quantum Konishi anomaly"). Only the operator K10 is allowed to appear in the right-hand side of the Konishi anomaly equation, the protected one O10 does not match the conformal properties of the left-hand side. Thus, in a superconformal renormalization scheme the separation into "classical" and "quantum" anomaly terms is not possible, and the question whether the Konishi anomaly is one-loop exact is out of context. The same treatment applies to the operators of the BMN family, for which no analogy with the traditional axial anomaly exists. We illustrate our abstract analysis of this mixing problem by an explicit calculation of the mixing matrix at level g^4 ("two loops") in the supersymmetric dimensional reduction scheme.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0501077




Recommendations



Cites Work


Cited In (19)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Operator mixing in \(\mathcal N=4\) SYM: the Konishi anomaly revisited

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q876145)