A comparison of modified fuzzy weights of evidence, fuzzy weights of evidence, and logistic regression for mapping mineral prospectivity

DOI10.1007/s11004-013-9496-8zbMath1323.86037OpenAlexW1988041076MaRDI QIDQ887596

Qiuming Cheng, Daojun Zhang, Renguang Zuo, F. P. Agterberg

Publication date: 26 October 2015

Published in: Mathematical Geosciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-013-9496-8

zbMATH Keywords

data integrationconditional independenceFujian provinceGIS modelingmineral resource assessment

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Geostatistics (86A32) Fuzzy analysis in statistics (62A86)

Related Items

Comment on: ``A comparison of modified fuzzy weights of evidence, fuzzy weights of evidence, and logistic regression for mapping mineral prospectivity, Response to comment by Helmut Schaeben on ``A comparison of modified fuzzy weights of evidence, fuzzy weights of evidence, and logistic regression for mapping mineral prospectivity, A new parameter estimation method for a logistic regression model of water shortage risk in the case of small sample numbers, Potential modeling: conditional independence matters

Uses Software

• LOGDIA

Cites Work

• A note on the domination inequalities and their applications
• Comparison of mathematical methods of potential modeling
• The nu expression for probabilistic data integration
• Nonlinear theory and power-law models for information integration and mineral resources quantitative assessments
• Combining knowledge from diverse sources: An alternative to traditional data independence hypotheses
• Evaluating Information Redundancy Through the Tau Model