Lagrangian concordance is not a symmetric relation

From MaRDI portal
Publication:889251



Abstract: We provide an explicit example of a non trivial Legendrian knot Lambda such that there exists a Lagrangian concordance from Lambda0 to Lambda where Lambda0 is the trivial Legendrian knot. We then use the map induced in Legendrian contact homology by a concordance and the augmentation category of Lambda to show that no Lagrangian concordance exists in the other direction. This proves that the relation of Lagrangian concordance is not symmetric.


This paper is a natural continuation of the author's earlier work [Algebr. Geom. Topol. 10, No. 1, 63--85 (2010; Zbl 1203.57010)], where it was proved that Lagrangian cobordism does not induce a symmetric relation on Legendrian knots, and that an invertible Lagrangian cobordism must in fact be a concordance. The main result of this paper shows that the Legendrian representative \(\Lambda \subset (\mathbb{R}^3,\xi_{st})\) of the knot \(m(9_{46})\) is the positive end of a Lagrangian concordance from the unknot, but does not admit a Lagrangian concordance to the unknot. This shows that the relation of Lagrangian concordance is not symmetric, even in the simplest possible case. The proof combines two main ingredients to yield a contradiction. The first ingredient, stated as Theorem 1.2, is of independent interest, and asserts that any self-concordance of the unknot with maximal Thurston-Bennequin invariant is in fact symplectomorphic to the product concordance. The second ingredient is the computation of maps induced by Lagrangian concordances and the augmentation category of \(\Lambda\).











This page was built for publication: Lagrangian concordance is not a symmetric relation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q889251)