A relative Hilbert-Mumford criterion
The object of this paper is to generalise the Hilbert-Mumford criterion to a relative situation. In fact, let \(k\) be an arbitrary field, \(A\) a noetherian \(k\)-algebra and \(f:X\to \text{Spec} A\) a projective morphism which is equivariant with respect to the action of a linearly reductive group \(G\). For \(\mathcal{L}\) an ample \(G\)-linearized invertible sheaf on \(X\) and \(p:\text{Spec}\Omega\to X\) a geometric point, stability is defined exactly as in the work of Mumford. Now suppose that \(\lambda:\mathbb{G}_{m,K}\to G_K\) is a \(1\)-parameter subgroup (\(1\)-PS) over some field extension \(K\) of \(\Omega\). If the morphism \(\mathbb{G}_{m,K}\to X_K\) defined by the action of \(\mathbb{G}_m\) on \(p\) extends to \(\mathbb{A}^1_K\to X_K\), it defines a unique \(K\)-valued limit point \(p_0=\lim_{t\rightarrow0}\lambda(t).p\). We define \(\mu^{\mathcal{L}}(\lambda,p)\) to be the negative of the \(\mathbb{G}_{m,K}\)-weight on the fibre \(\mathcal{L}(p_0)\) if \(p_0\) exists and \(\infty\) otherwise. Then (Theorem 3.3) \(p\) is stable ( semistable) if and only if \(\mu^{\mathcal{L}}(\lambda,p)>0 (\geq0)\) for every \(1\)-PS \(\lambda:\mathbb{G}_{m,K}\to G_K\) and every field extension \(K\) of \(\Omega\). If \(\text{Spec} A\) is of finite type over \(k\), it is sufficient to check the criterion for \(K=\Omega\). The proof follows that of Mumford for the case where \(X\) is projective. In the relative case considered here, one can embed \(X\) equivariantly into a projective fibre space \(\mathbb{P}(V)\to\text{Spec} A\). However, there is a problem in that there is no diagonalisation result for \(\mathbb{G}_m\)-actions on \(\mathbb{P}(V)\) and the authors have to find a substitute for this. Section 2 contains the basic definitions, a summary of results of Mumford and the extension, where necessary, of these to the new situation. The numerical criterion is stated in Section 3 and proved in Section 5 following the establishment of a geometric criterion in Section 4. The paper concludes with some examples in Section 6.
- Relative VGIT and an application to degenerations of Hilbert schemes
- GIT semistability of Hilbert points of Milnor algebras
- Relative geometric invariant theory
- A remark on relative geometric invariant theory for quasi‐projective varieties
- Hilbert-Mumford stability on algebraic stacks and applications to $\mathcal{G}$-bundles on curves
- Expanded degenerations and pairs
- Geometric Invariant Theory
- Geometric reductivity over arbitrary base
- Global Boundedness for Decorated Sheaves
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1001625 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1748084 (Why is no real title available?)
- Lectures on introduction to moduli problems and orbit spaces
- MODULI OF REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE DIMENSIONAL ALGEBRAS
- Quotient spaces modulo reductive algebraic groups
- RELATIVE GEOMETRIC INVARIANT THEORY AND UNIVERSAL MODULI SPACES
- Stability and equivariant maps
- Stable morphisms to singular schemes and relative stable morphisms.
- Stability and equivariant maps
- Relative geometric invariant theory
- A GIT construction of degenerations of Hilbert schemes of points
- A useful semistability criterion
- Compactifications of reductive groups as moduli stacks of bundles
- An elementary proof of the Hilbert-Mumford criterion
- GIT semistability of Hilbert points of Milnor algebras
- The essential skeleton of a product of degenerations
- Relative VGIT and an application to degenerations of Hilbert schemes
- Moduli spaces and geometric invariant theory: old and new perspectives
- Real and logarithmic enumerative geometry. Abstracts from the workshop held May 5--10, 2024
- Kempf-Ness type theorems and Nahm equations
- Expansions for Hilbert schemes of points on semistable degenerations
This page was built for publication: A relative Hilbert-Mumford criterion
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q889628)