Haar null sets without G_ hulls

From MaRDI portal
Publication:891152



Abstract: Let G be an abelian Polish group, e.g. a separable Banach space. A subset XsubsetG is called Haar null (in the sense of Christensen) if there exists a Borel set BsupsetX and a Borel probability measure mu on G such that mu(B+g)=0 for every ginG. The term shy is also commonly used for Haar null, and co-Haar null sets are often called prevalent. Answering an old question of Mycielski we show that if G is not locally compact then there exists a Borel Haar null set that is not contained in any Gdelta Haar null set. We also show that Gdelta can be replaced by any other class of the Borel hierarchy, which implies that the additivity of the sigma-ideal of Haar null sets is omega1. The definition of a generalised Haar null set is obtained by replacing the Borelness of B in the above definition by universal measurability. We give an example of a generalised Haar null set that is not Haar null, more precisely we construct a coanalytic generalised Haar null set without a Borel Haar null hull. This solves Problem GP from Fremlin's problem list. Actually, all our results readily generalise to all Polish groups that admit a two-sided invariant metric.


Let \(G\) be an abelian Polish group that is not locally compact. The main results of the paper are as follows: (1) there exists a Haar null (=shy in another terminology) subset of \(G\) that is not contained in any \(G_\delta\) Haar null subset of \(G\) (Theorem 1.3); (2) there exists a generalised Haar null subset of \(G\) that is not Haar null (Theorem 1.8). They answer some questions due to J. Mycielski and D. H. Fremlin, respectively. Under some set-theoretical assumptions, (2) was earlier obtained by \textit{R. Dougherty} [Fundam. Math. 144, No. 1, 73--88 (1994; Zbl 0842.43006)] and \textit{T. Banakh} [Commentat. Math. Univ. Carol. 45, No. 1, 119--137 (2004; Zbl 1098.03057)]. The main ingredients of the proofs of (1) and (2) are some classical results from descriptive set theory (universal sets, uniformisation) and some techniques developped by \textit{S. Solecki} [Fundam. Math. 149, No. 3, 205--210 (1996; Zbl 0887.28006); Fundam. Math. 170, No. 1--2, 197--217 (2001; Zbl 0994.28006)]. Recall that the difference between the notions of a Haar null set and that of a generalised Haar null set consists in using Borel sets in the former case and universally measurable sets in the latter case in their definitions. The generalised Haar null sets were first defined (under a different name) by \textit{J. P. R. Christensen} [Isr. J. Math. 13, (1973; Zbl 0249.43002)]. Reviewer's remark: There is some analogy between (2) and a result of \textit{E. Grzegorek} and \textit{C. Ryll-Nardzewski} [Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., Sér. Sci. Math. 28, 229--232 (1980; Zbl 0496.28002), Proposition a].











This page was built for publication: Haar null sets without \(G_{\delta}\) hulls

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q891152)