On the eliminability of ideal linguistic entities
By means of mathematical logic two axiomatic theories are constructed with reference to two ontologically opposed approaches to language syntax: nominalistic and platonic. Both theories of language syntax are formalized, bi-aspectual and in S. Leśniewski--K. Ajdukiewicz--H. Curry spirit of the theory of syntactic categories. The first one is based on postulating the existence of concretes of language and defines their abstractive constructs of language as classes of equiform concretes, while the other is founded on postulating the existence of abstractive constructs of language and defines concretes of language as their representatives. The paper proves that both approaches are equivalent, which seems to point to the advantage of the nominalistic one.
- Categorial languages and variable-binding operators
- Essays in logical semantics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3957067 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4002073 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4045723 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3611345 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3254899 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3090158 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3099235 (Why is no real title available?)
- Logical and philosophical ideas in certain formal approaches to language
- Meaning and interpretation. II
- Syntactic reductionism
- On Meta-Knowledge and Truth
- Calculus of Contextual Rough Sets in Contextual Spaces
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2019853 (Why is no real title available?)
- Meaning and interpretation. I
This page was built for publication: On the eliminability of ideal linguistic entities
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q916641)