Reflection implies the SCH
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: We prove that, e.g., if mu >cf(mu)= aleph_0 and mu>2^{aleph_0} and every stationary family of countable subsets of mu^+ reflect in some subset of mu^+ of cardinality aleph_1, then the SCH for mu^+ (moreover, for mu^+, any scale for mu^+ has a bad stationary set of cofinality aleph_1). This answers a question of Foreman and Todorcevic who got such conclusion from the simultaneous reflection of four stationary sets.
Recommendations
Cited in
(17)- INTERNAL APPROACHABILITY AND REFLECTION
- Combinatorial Dichotomies in Set Theory
- WEAK REFLECTION PRINCIPLE, SATURATION OF THE NONSTATIONARY IDEAL ON ω1 AND DIAMONDS
- Sigma-Prikry forcing. III: Down to \(\aleph_{\omega}\)
- Nonreflecting stationary sets in \(\mathcal P_{\kappa}\lambda\)
- More on full reflection below \({\aleph_\omega}\)
- Club stationary reflection and the special Aronszajn tree property
- Leave Pima Indians alone: binary regression as a benchmark for Bayesian computation
- Non-saturation of the non-stationary ideal on \(P_{\kappa } (\lambda )\) with \(\lambda \) of countable cofinality
- Bayesian analysis of curves shape variation through registration and regression
- MENAS’S CONJECTURE REVISITED
- Rado's conjecture and its Baire version
- Partitioning a reflecting stationary set
- Simple proofs of SCH from reflection principles without using better scales
- What makes the continuum ℵ₂
- A club guessing toolbox. I
- STATIONARY REFLECTION AND THE FAILURE OF THE SCH
This page was built for publication: Reflection implies the SCH
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5440227)