Root number bias for newforms
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Previously we observed that newforms obey a strict bias towards root number in squarefree levels: at least half of the newforms in with root number for squarefree, and it is strictly more than half outside of a few special cases. Subsequently, other authors treated levels which are cubes of squarefree numbers. Here we treat arbitrary levels, and find that if the level is not the square of a squarefree number, this strict bias still holds for any weight. In fact the number of such exceptional levels is finite for fixed weight, and 0 if . We also investigate some variants of this question to better understand the exceptional levels.
Recommendations
Cites work
- A classical invitation to algebraic numbers and class fields. With two appendices by Olga Taussky: `Artin's 1932 Göttingen lectures on class field theory' and `Connections between algebraic number theory and integral matrices'.
- Bias of root numbers for Hilbert newforms of cubic level
- Bias of root numbers for modular newforms of cubic level
- Congruences for modular forms mod 2 and quaternionic S-ideal classes
- Dimension formulas for modular form spaces with character for Fricke groups
- Dimensions of the spaces of cusp forms and newforms on \(\Gamma_0(N)\) and \(\Gamma_1(N)\)
- Hecke operators on \(\Gamma_0(m)\)
- Jacobi forms and a certain space of modular forms
- On the change of root numbers under twisting and applications
- On the local Langlands conjecture for GL(2)
- On the traces of Hecke operators for a normalizer of \(\Gamma_0\)(N)
- Refined dimensions of cusp forms, and equidistribution and bias of signs
- The basis problem for modular forms on Γ₀(𝑁)
- The basis problem revisited
- Twists of newforms
- Twists of newforms and pseudo-eigenvalues of \(W\)-operators
Cited in
(5)
This page was built for publication: Root number bias for newforms
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6106040)