Sampling‐based Randomised Designs for Causal Inference under the Potential Outcomes Framework

DOI10.1111/INSR.12339MaRDI QIDQ6064341zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Zach Branson, Tirthankar Dasgupta

Publication date 12 December 2023

Published in International Statistical Review (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.01691

zbMATH Keywords

causal inferenceexperimental designpotential outcomesrandomised experimentssurvey sampling

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of mathematics and mathematicians (01Axx) Nonparametric inference (62Gxx) Applications of statistics (62Pxx)

Abstract: We establish the inferential properties of the mean-difference estimator for the average treatment effect in randomized experiments where each unit in a population is randomized to one of two treatments and then units within treatment groups are randomly sampled. The properties of this estimator are well-understood in the experimental design scenario where first units are randomly sampled and then treatment is randomly assigned, but not for the aforementioned scenario where the sampling and treatment assignment stages are reversed. We find that the inferential properties of the mean-difference estimator under this experimental design scenario are identical to those under the more common sample-first-randomize-second design. This finding will bring some clarifications about sampling-based randomized designs for causal inference, particularly for settings where there is a finite super-population. Finally, we explore to what extent pre-treatment measurements can be used to improve upon the mean-difference estimator for this randomize-first-sample-second design. Unfortunately, we find that pre-treatment measurements are often unhelpful in improving the precision of average treatment effect estimators under this design, unless a large number of pre-treatment measurements that are highly associative with the post-treatment measurements can be obtained. We confirm these results using a simulation study based on a real experiment in nanomaterials.

Cites work

• Adjusting Treatment Effect Estimates by Post-Stratification in Randomized Experiments
• Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: reexamining Freedman's critique
• Analyzing two-stage experiments in the presence of interference
• Bias of the regression estimator for experiments using clustered random assignment
• Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. An introduction
• Comment on J. Neyman and causal inference in experiments and observational studies: On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9 [Ann. Agric. Sci. 10 (1923), 1--51]
• Estimating average causal effects under general interference, with application to a social network experiment
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3166683 (Why is no real title available?)
• Inference on a New Class of Sample Average Treatment Effects
• On equivalencies between design-based and regression-based variance estimators for randomized experiments
• On regression adjustments in experiments with several treatments
• On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9. Translated from the Polish and edited by D. M. Dąbrowska and T. P. Speed
• Randomization inference for treatment effect variation
• Statistics and Causal Inference
• Using standard tools from finite population sampling to improve causal inference for complex experiments

Cited in

(3)

• Causal Inference in Outcome-Dependent Two-Phase Sampling Designs
• Rejective Sampling, Rerandomization, and Regression Adjustment in Survey Experiments
• Sample size and power calculations for causal inference in observational studies

This page was built for publication: Sampling‐based Randomised Designs for Causal Inference under the Potential Outcomes Framework

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6064341)