netmeta

swMATH17232CRANnetmetaMaRDI QIDQ29093

Network Meta-Analysis using Frequentist Methods

Guido Schwarzer, Theodoros Papakonstantinou, Orestis Efthimiou, Gerta Rücker, Annabel L Davies, Jochem König, Ulrike Krahn

Last update: 11 January 2024

Copyright license: GNU General Public License, version 3.0, GNU General Public License, version 2.0

Software version identifier: 2.8-1, 2.8-2, 0.3-0, 0.3-1, 0.4-0, 0.4-1, 0.4-2, 0.4-3, 0.4-4, 0.5-0, 0.6-0, 0.7-0, 0.8-0, 0.9-0, 0.9-1, 0.9-2, 0.9-3, 0.9-4, 0.9-5, 0.9-6, 0.9-7, 0.9-8, 1.0-0, 1.0-1, 1.1-0, 1.2-0, 1.2-1, 1.3-0, 1.4-0, 1.5-0, 2.0-0, 2.0-1, 2.1-0, 2.5-0, 2.6-0, 2.7-0, 2.8-0, 2.9-0

Source code repository: https://github.com/cran/netmeta

Description

A comprehensive set of functions providing frequentist methods for network meta-analysis (Balduzzi et al., 2023) <doi:10.18637/jss.v106.i02> and supporting Schwarzer et al. (2015) <doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21416-0>, Chapter 8 "Network Meta-Analysis": - frequentist network meta-analysis following Rücker (2012) <doi:10.1002/jrsm.1058>; - additive network meta-analysis for combinations of treatments (Rücker et al., 2020) <doi:10.1002/bimj.201800167>; - network meta-analysis of binary data using the Mantel-Haenszel or non-central hypergeometric distribution method (Efthimiou et al., 2019) <doi:10.1002/sim.8158>; - rankograms and ranking of treatments by the Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) (Salanti et al., 2013) <doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016>; - ranking of treatments using P-scores (frequentist analogue of SUCRAs without resampling) according to Rücker & Schwarzer (2015) <doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0060-8>; - split direct and indirect evidence to check consistency (Dias et al., 2010) <doi:10.1002/sim.3767>, (Efthimiou et al., 2019) <doi:10.1002/sim.8158>; - league table with network meta-analysis results; - 'comparison-adjusted' funnel plot (Chaimani & Salanti, 2012) <doi:10.1002/jrsm.57>; - net heat plot and design-based decomposition of Cochran's Q according to Krahn et al. (2013) <doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-35>; - measures characterizing the flow of evidence between two treatments by König et al. (2013) <doi:10.1002/sim.6001>; - automated drawing of network graphs described in Rücker & Schwarzer (2016) <doi:10.1002/jrsm.1143>; - partial order of treatment rankings ('poset') and Hasse diagram for 'poset' (Carlsen & Bruggemann, 2014) <doi:10.1002/cem.2569>; (Rücker & Schwarzer, 2017) <doi:10.1002/jrsm.1270>; - contribution matrix as described in Papakonstantinou et al. (2018) <doi:10.12688/f1000research.14770.3> and Davies et al. (2022) <doi:10.1002/sim.9346>.

Cites work

• netmeta: An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods
• Meta-Analysis with R
• Network meta-analysis, electrical networks and graph theory
• Network meta‐analysis of multicomponent interventions
• Network meta‐analysis of rare events using the Mantel‐Haenszel method
• Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial
• Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods
• Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
• Using network meta-analysis to evaluate the existence of small-study effects in a network of interventions
• A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses
• Visualizing the flow of evidence in network meta-analysis and characterizing mixed treatment comparisons
• Automated drawing of network plots in network meta-analysis
• Partial order methodology: a valuable tool in chemometrics
• Resolve conflicting rankings of outcomes in network meta‐analysis: Partial ordering of treatments
• Estimating the contribution of studies in network meta-analysis: paths, flows and streams
• Network meta‐analysis and random walks

Described by source

• Network meta‐analysis of multicomponent interventions

Related Items (19)

Weighing Evidence “Steampunk” Style via the Meta-Analyser ⋮ Meta-Analysis for Rare Events As Binary Outcomes ⋮ Meta-Analysis with R ⋮ Detecting and adjusting for small‐study effects in meta‐analysis ⋮ Diagnostic test meta-analysis by empirical likelihood under a Copas-like selection model ⋮ Count outcome meta-analysis for comparing treatments by fusing mixed data sources: comparing interventions using across report information ⋮ rankinma ⋮ Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis ⋮ nmarank ⋮ viscomp ⋮ rnmamod ⋮ fragility ⋮ crossnma ⋮ NMAoutlier ⋮ ssifs ⋮ Bivariate beta-binomial model using Gaussian copula for bivariate meta-analysis of two binary outcomes with low incidence ⋮ Assessing the Sensitivity of Meta-analysis to Selection Bias: A Multiple Imputation Approach ⋮ Empirical likelihood meta-analysis with publication bias correction under copas-like selection model ⋮ Copas' method is sensitive to different mechanisms of publication bias

This page was built for software: netmeta