Some selection rules for comparing p processes with a standard

DOI10.1080/03610927508827267MaRDI QIDQ4066364zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Umesh D. Naik

Publication date 1975

Published in Communications in Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/03610927508827267

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistical decision theory (62C99) Statistical ranking and selection procedures (62F07)

Cited in

(18)

• Sequentially rejective pairwise testing procedures
• Closed procedures are better and often admit a shortcut.
• Closed subset selection procedures for selecting good populations
• The partitioning principle: a powerful tool in multiple decision theory
• Duality between multiple testing and selecting
• Basic concepts of multiple tests -- a survey
• Multiple comparisons with ‘best’ for multivariate normal populations
• On the Geometry of some Subset Selection Procedures
• Simultaneous comparisons with a control and with the “best”
• A generalized step-up-down multiple test procedure
• A note on confidence bounds after fixed-sequence multiple tests
• Multiple Comparisons with the Best Control in a One-Way Layout
• General theory of mixture procedures for gatekeeping
• A two-stage design for comparing binomial treatments with a standard
• Selection among Bernoulli populations in comparison with a standard
• Traditional multiplicity adjustment methods in clinical trials
• A curtailed selection and testing design for comparing binomial treatments with a standard
• Sample size determination for step-down multiple test procedures: Orthogonal contrasts and comparisons with a control

This page was built for publication: Some selection rules for comparing p processes with a standard

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4066364)