Subjective probability and quantum certainty
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: In the Bayesian approach to quantum mechanics, probabilities--and thus quantum states--represent an agent's degrees of belief, rather than corresponding to objective properties of physical systems. In this paper we investigate the concept of certainty in quantum mechanics. Particularly, we show how the probability-1 predictions derived from pure quantum states highlight a fundamental difference between our Bayesian approach, on the one hand, and Copenhagen and similar interpretations on the other. We first review the main arguments for the general claim that probabilities always represent degrees of belief. We then argue that a quantum state prepared by some physical device always depends on an agent's prior beliefs, implying that the probability-1 predictions derived from that state also depend on the agent's prior beliefs. Quantum certainty is therefore always some agent's certainty. Conversely, if facts about an experimental setup could imply agent-independent certainty for a measurement outcome, as in many Copenhagen-like interpretations, that outcome would effectively correspond to a preexisting system property. The idea that measurement outcomes occurring with certainty correspond to preexisting system properties is, however, in conflict with locality. We emphasize this by giving a version of an argument of Stairs [A. Stairs, Phil. Sci. 50, 578 (1983)], which applies the Kochen-Specker theorem to an entangled bipartite system.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1579275 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3984308 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3770630 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 578421 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3434895 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 762949 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3249395 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3189754 (Why is no real title available?)
- Betting on the outcomes of measurements: a Bayesian theory of quantum probability
- CONTEXTUAL OBJECTIVITY AND THE QUANTUM FORMALISM
- Entanglement purification of unknown quantum states
- Facts, values and quanta
- In praise of measurement
- Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics
- Niels Bohr and the philosophy of physics. Twenty-first-century perspectives
- Propensity and necessity
- Properties of the frequency operator do not imply the quantum probability postulate
- Quantum logic, realism, and value definiteness
- Quantum theory: concepts and methods
- Subjective Probability
- Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
- Unknown quantum states: The quantum de Finetti representation
Cited in
(29)- Subjectivists about quantum probabilities should be realists about quantum states
- Quantum causality relations and the emergence of reality from coherent superpositions
- Respecting one's fellow: QBism's analysis of Wigner's friend
- The problem of dispersion-free probabilities in Gleason-type theorems for a two-dimensional Hilbert space
- Probabilism for stochastic theories
- Separation of conditions as a prerequisite for quantum theory
- A loose and separate certainty: Caves, Fuchs and Schack on quantum probability one
- How to spell out the epistemic conception of quantum states
- Quantum locality
- A remark on Fuchs Bayesian interpretation of quantum mechanics
- Quantum probabilities as degrees of belief
- Quantum Bayesianism: a study
- Truth values of quantum phenomena
- External Observer Reflections on QBism, Its Possible Modifications, and Novel Applications
- Objective probability and quantum fuzziness
- Quantum information versus epistemic logic: an analysis of the Frauchiger-Renner theorem
- Quantum theory as the most robust description of reproducible experiments
- Uncomfortable bedfellows: objective quantum Bayesianism and the von Neumann-Lüders projection postulate
- Towards better understanding QBism
- Why scientific realists should reject the second dogma of quantum mechanics
- Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
- Quantum Bayesianism as the basis of general theory of decision-making
- Quantum Mechanics as a Theory of Probability
- Is Bananaworld nonlocal?
- A No-Go result for QBism
- Is the reality criterion analytic?
- On quantum vs. classical probability
- A quantum-Bayesian route to quantum-state space
- On probabilities in biology and physics
This page was built for publication: Subjective probability and quantum certainty
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q643112)
