Support recovery without incoherence: a case for nonconvex regularization

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: We demonstrate that the primal-dual witness proof method may be used to establish variable selection consistency and ellinfty-bounds for sparse regression problems, even when the loss function and/or regularizer are nonconvex. Using this method, we derive two theorems concerning support recovery and ellinfty-guarantees for the regression estimator in a general setting. Our results provide rigorous theoretical justification for the use of nonconvex regularization: For certain nonconvex regularizers with vanishing derivative away from the origin, support recovery consistency may be guaranteed without requiring the typical incoherence conditions present in ell1-based methods. We then derive several corollaries that illustrate the wide applicability of our method to analyzing composite objective functions involving losses such as least squares, nonconvex modified least squares for errors-in variables linear regression, the negative log likelihood for generalized linear models, and the graphical Lasso. We conclude with empirical studies to corroborate our theoretical predictions.


A new primal-dual witness proof framework is given that may be used to establish variable selection consistency and \(\ell_{+\infty}\)-bounds for sparse regression problems, even when the loss function and regularizes are nonconvex. The analysis in this paper applies to regularized \(M\)-estimators. From a statistical perspective, the purpose of solving the problem above is to estimate the vector that minimizes the expected loss. The estimator must be unique and independent of the sample size. Conditions are developed under which a minimizer of \(M\)-estimators is consistent with the estimator which minimizes the expected loss. In this paper, it is proved that for certain nonconvex regularizers with vanishing derivative away from the origin, any stationary point can be used to recover the support without requiring the typical incoherence conditions present in \(\ell_1\)-based methods. Numerical examples are given to justify the statement above.




Cited in
(63)








This page was built for publication: Support recovery without incoherence: a case for nonconvex regularization

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q682289)