Surface approximation is sometimes easier than surface integration
The paper is devoted to the study of surface approximation and surface integration over a given domain [cf. \textit{A. G. Werschulz} et al., J. Complexity 17, No.2, 442--466 (2001; Zbl 0984.68084) and J. Complexity 18, 660--678 (2002; Zbl 1051.68083)]. It is assumed here that the surfaces are nondegenerate. The foregoing problems are first studied over images of cubes. Finally these results are extended to smooth surfaces defined as oriented cellulated regions or as images of balls. Error for surface approximation problem is measured in the \(L_q \)-sense. Using these results the authors determine when surface approximation is easier than, as easy as, or harder than surface integration.
- Calculating a surface integral
- Reduction of surface integrals to contour integrals
- A varifold approach to surface approximation
- Some Error Estimates for the Numerical Approximation of Surface Integrals
- Approximating the volume integral by a surface integral via the divergence theorem
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7166885
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1487773
- Surface integrals approach to solution of some free boundary problems
This page was built for publication: Surface approximation is sometimes easier than surface integration
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1885349)