The effects of anchoring an interactive MCDM solution methods

DOI10.1016/S0305-0548(97)00014-2MaRDI QIDQ1366701zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors John Buchanan, James Corner

Publication date 12 November 1997

Published in Computers \& Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-0548(97)00014-2

zbMATH Keywords

anchoringinteractive MCDM solution methods

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Recommendations

• An Experimental Evaluation of Interactive MCDM Methods and the Decision Making Process
• Searching for psychologically stable solutions of multiple criteria decision problems
• Publication:4945549
• A Field Experiment Comparing Anchored and Unanchored Criteria Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4085440 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3769296 (Why is no real title available?)
• A naïve approach for solving MCDM problems: the GUESS method
• A simplified interactive multiple objective linear programming procedure
• An Interactive Approach for Multi-Criterion Optimization, with an Application to the Operation of an Academic Department
• An Interactive Multiple Objective Linear Programming Method for a Class of Underlying Nonlinear Utility Functions
• An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming
• Comparative Evaluation of Some Interactive Approaches to Multicriterion Optimization
• Experimental consideration of preference in decision making under certainty
• Interactive multiple objective optimization: Survey. I: Continuous case
• Multiple objective decision making - methods and applications. A state- of-the-art survey. In collaboration with Sudhakar R. Paidy and Kwangsun Yoon
• Unified interactive multiple objective programming

Cited in

(10)

• Are groups `less behavioral'? The case of anchoring
• A comparison of two interactive MCDM procedures
• The ``Light Beam Search approach. -- An overview of methodology and applications
• Path dependence and biases in the even swaps decision analysis method
• Optimistic NAUTILUS navigator for multiobjective optimization with costly function evaluations
• NAUTILUS navigator: free search interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off
• Analyzing anchoring bias in attribute weight elicitation of SMART, Swing, and best‐worst method
• A new preference handling technique for interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off
• NAUTILUS method: an interactive technique in multiobjective optimization based on the Nadir point
• Best-worst tradeoff method

This page was built for publication: The effects of anchoring an interactive MCDM solution methods

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1366701)