The logical structure of linguistic commitment. II: Systems of relevant commitment entailment
From MaRDI portal
The paper defines some systems based on the ``relevance interpretation of implication. The first part of the theory of implication as a relation between ``commitment to \(A\) and ``commitment to \(B\) (without taking into account the ``relevance requirement) appeared ibid. 23, No. 4, 369-400 (1994; Zbl 0809.03001). The presented conception is compared with Urquhart's and Fine's interpretations.
Recommendations
- The logical structure of linguistic commitment. I: Four systems of non- relevant commitment entailment
- A theory of logical relevance
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 48206
- The logical structure of linguistic commitment. III: Brandomian scorekeeping and incompatibility
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4055572
Cites work
- An Interpretation of Many-Valued Logic
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4014675 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3926879 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 596497 (Why is no real title available?)
- Models for entailment
- On the logic of contingent relevant implication: A conceptual incoherence in the intuitive interpretation of R
- Semantics for relevant logics
- The logical structure of linguistic commitment. I: Four systems of non- relevant commitment entailment
Cited in
(9)- Propositional logic of supposition and assertion
- The logical structure of linguistic commitment. I: Four systems of non- relevant commitment entailment
- The implicit commitment of arithmetical theories and its semantic core
- Meaning as an inferential role
- A theory of logical relevance
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4037819 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4061203 (Why is no real title available?)
- The logical structure of linguistic commitment. III: Brandomian scorekeeping and incompatibility
- SUBATOMIC INFERENCES: AN INFERENTIALIST SEMANTICS FOR ATOMICS, PREDICATES, AND NAMES
This page was built for publication: The logical structure of linguistic commitment. II: Systems of relevant commitment entailment
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1815416)