The statistical bias of numerically integrated statistical procedures
Maximum likelihood estimation of multivariate normal models and Bayesian posterior density functions can require calculation using numerical integration. Although the statistical theory is unchanged for nonanalytical integrals, the exorbitant cost of estimating such models frequently induces researchers to use a small number of integration points. If the number of points is insufficient to calculate essentially exact values of the function being maximized, the resulting estimators are asymptotically biased and inconsistent both for the values of the estimated parameters and for their variances. The forms of the biases are derived and described in this paper.
- A Computationally Efficient Quadrature Procedure for the One-Factor Multinomial Probit Model
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3273551 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3350922 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3361229 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3390199 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3407003 (Why is no real title available?)
This page was built for publication: The statistical bias of numerically integrated statistical procedures
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1070711)