Tight approximation ratio of anonymous pricing
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: We consider two canonical Bayesian mechanism design settings. In the single-item setting, we prove tight approximation ratio for anonymous pricing: compared with Myerson Auction, it extracts at least -fraction of revenue; there is a matching lower-bound example. In the unit-demand single-buyer setting, we prove tight approximation ratio between the simplest and optimal deterministic mechanisms: in terms of revenue, uniform pricing admits a -approximation of item pricing; we further validate the tightness of this ratio. These results settle two open problems asked in~cite{H13,CD15,AHNPY15,L17,JLTX18}. As an implication, in the single-item setting: we improve the approximation ratio of the second-price auction with anonymous reserve to , which breaks the state-of-the-art upper bound of .
Recommendations
Cited in
(9)- Optimal pricing for MHR distributions
- Optimal auctions vs. anonymous pricing
- Anonymous auctions maximizing revenue
- Tight revenue gaps among multiunit mechanisms
- Tight revenue gaps among simple mechanisms
- Tight revenue gaps among simple mechanisms
- First price auction is 1-1/e^2 efficient
- q-partitioning valuations: exploring the space between subadditive and fractionally subadditive valuations
- On the approximability of simple mechanisms for MHR distributions
This page was built for publication: Tight approximation ratio of anonymous pricing
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5212808)