Translating preferred subtheories into structured argumentation

DOI10.1093/LOGCOM/EXT049MaRDI QIDQ2937694zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors

Publication date 12 January 2015

Published in Journal Of Logic And Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/ext049

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationBrewkaDungpreferred subtheoriestranslation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Other nonclassical logic (03B60)

Recommendations

• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
• A comparative study of assumption-based argumentative approaches to reasoning with priorities
• What can argumentation do for inconsistent ontology query answering?

Cited in

(4)

• Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities
• Classical logic, argument and dialectic
• On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
• A dialectical formalisation of preferred subtheories reasoning under resource bounds

This page was built for publication: Translating preferred subtheories into structured argumentation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2937694)