Using extension sets to aggregate partial rankings in a flexible setting
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4076317 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3624650 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1288298 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3405712 (Why is no real title available?)
- A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION
- A randomized approximation algorithm for computing bucket orders
- Aggregating inconsistent information: ranking and clustering
- Aggregation of partial rankings, \(p\)-ratings and top-\(m\) lists
- An extension on ``Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets for all pairwise comparisons
- Clustering algorithms for chains
- Comparing Top k Lists
- Experiments with Kemeny ranking: What works when?
- Metric methods for analyzing partially ranked data
- Ordering by weighted number of wins gives a good ranking for weighted tournaments
- Rank aggregation: together we're strong
- Tackling the rank aggregation problem with evolutionary algorithms
- The complexity of Kemeny elections
- The original Borda count and partial voting
- Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election
Cited in
(5)- A unifying rank aggregation framework to suitably and efficiently aggregate any kind of rankings
- Approaching rank aggregation problems by using evolution strategies: the case of the optimal bucket order problem
- Partial evaluation in rank aggregation problems
- Multivariate Spearman's \(\rho\) for aggregating ranks using copulas
- Approaching the rank aggregation problem by local search-based metaheuristics
This page was built for publication: Using extension sets to aggregate partial rankings in a flexible setting
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1733690)