Weaknesses in two recent lightweight RFID authentication protocols

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-16342-5_28MaRDI QIDQ3056912zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Pedro Peris-Lopez, Juan M. E. Tapiador, Tieyan Li, J. C. A. van der Lubbe, Julio Cesar Hernandez-Castro

Publication date 23 November 2010

Published in Information Security and Cryptology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16342-5_28

zbMATH Keywords

BANCloningCryptanalysisEPCImpersonationProofRFIDTraceability

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Data encryption (aspects in computer science) (68P25) Authentication, digital signatures and secret sharing (94A62)

Recommendations

• Weaknesses in two RFID authentication protocols
• Weaknesses in a Recent Ultra-Lightweight RFID Authentication Protocol
• Quasi-linear cryptanalysis of a secure RFID ultralightweight authentication protocol
• Towards a lightweight, secure, and untraceable RFID authentication protocol
• Traceable Privacy of Recent Provably-Secure RFID Protocols

Cited in

(8)

• Towards a lightweight, secure, and untraceable RFID authentication protocol
• Metaheuristic traceability attack against SLMAP, an RFID lightweight authentication protocol
• Weaknesses in two RFID authentication protocols
• A provable secure batch authentication scheme for EPCGen2 tags
• Quasi-linear cryptanalysis of a secure RFID ultralightweight authentication protocol
• Addressing flaws in RFID authentication protocols
• Weaknesses in a Recent Ultra-Lightweight RFID Authentication Protocol
• More on the Security of Linear RFID Authentication Protocols

This page was built for publication: Weaknesses in two recent lightweight RFID authentication protocols

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3056912)